.tsersä dotrudone? ‚ki
.E.O.M
.nebac I
.erer yful die
MOTI
-state 10 y15J01088-zakaŬ sdt
soi110 islao 100 .Jestra za Lawod
.I.W.8
@I\ OSSBE.CH. Tai
+
་
112
Jassent fit ads to rejjef way to tqiesst al ma I -300H to Jagmæravoð sá♪ gotzataknimba realt20 ada jet ston I doldw Brassy Jædt sidstlupe ti Tobianoo ton seob ed sada bedroger and goo1 blodata .ezenek 10 uteaan eɗt wist bluedɛ .00 £ steńters blodarā -10 edr yitasupeenoo jedt bas eelsliideti sät tuodsin .00 £ ¿TOďIEX sw Jadd sbiemmo Der gaodynoH to jasmiisvoð sdt gnitateinimbe (Spil taw-atq ad♪ stablupil od stromegartig eism of berlupat ed bivoda -szq aoitibnod s na mtit blo sdt to donstƐ amoxynol ede santags emisio quitem olørt add to au of snomaginan sát ca tasbeo
-300 & 11 am of coROD NOISESinusmco aids sadt Jimka Jaum I
-teinimba 1601120 ads tads faldt tud scanso I bms „auitqque eldstebis bnim al etost edr iis Led sved tonnso gnoxyaok to insanzevoð sát zatze .noitabasamooer sid pakiem nodw Jesuper suo jadi woy bainer or swtasy I sosiq sezit oda al (1 *ČAK BAW ETit Lio end to sizam støts ads to sau siam od molasiexeq TC1
-aa ased bad odw aretusostuna) dalsizā to ataozotal odt ni qiisqionizy -Banq visnedenço stev odw bna sxzam obɛxt weeks tabnu gida os bemotaưO bavot yods ns,nolemiming aidt nietɗo os szolte yzove siam có su gala
•
-2-
25
that the absence of these trade marks, which had been introduced into the Colony for years, was greatly militating against the sale of their goods. During my original interview with an Officer of your Depart- ment I was certainly given to understand that, if we could obtain a Declaration from the Courts establishing our right to the goodwill and trade marks of the old firm, we should be granted every facility to enable us to make use of these trade marks in Hongkong, and it was no- ver indicated that the assignation of these trade marks tque was to be made dependent on our making arrangements to liquidate the pre-war liabilities of the Hongkong Branch of the old firm. I would refer you in this
La connection to your letters of the 11th of February 1918, Ref.No.5364/1918 and of the 8th of March 1919, Ref.No.12744/1919,
AK. neither of which makes any reference to the requirements which is nÓW apparently stipulated as a condition precedent to the assignation to us of the trade marks. Had we originally been informed that any such condition would be made, we should certainly not have gone to the
trouble and expense of obtaining the Declaration from the Courts which you asked for, and would have preferred to dispense with the use of the old trade marks until such time as we could enforce our righte
against the old firm.
a) In the second place, the deficit arising out of the liquida-
tion of the Hongkong Branch of the old firm is due to the fact that this was a branch only, and the liquidatore have evidenɗtly not taken into account the fact that the Hongkong Firm had a very large credit balance with the head office in Shanghai, which of course could not be recovered by the liquidators.
I have interpreted the recommendation of the Officer admin-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.